Monday, October 1, 2012

OBAMA'S UN SPEECH HOSTIL TO CHRISTIANITY




Obama appeared to be against Christians practicing Christianity during his UN speech.  In his UN speech he said,

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied…"

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."  In other words, you cannot say anything bad about the prophet. 

It is a Christian belief that Mohammed is not a prophet.  So this belief would be slander.  Jesus came and died for the sins of mankind.  On the third day He rose again, which made clear that Satan had been conquered.  Jesus made it possible for man to return to God.  This was the task that Jesus came to do.  This is why, when He hung on the cross, He said: "It is finished".   All the work of the prophets and Jesus was accomplished there on the cross.  Man had the ability to approach God again as Adam and Eve did before they sinned.  Six hundred years later, Muhammad comes to tell that everything's actually different.  This makes it impossible for Christians to acknowledge Muhammad as a prophet.

So if you believe that Christ is the only way to salvation.  Believing that is slandering Mohammed.  That’s just a fact.  If you don’t believe me, you go into parts of the Middle East and proclaim Christ is the way, the truth, and the life and see what happens.

Then Obama continues,

"Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated…"  

Earlier he says we are to "not slander the prophet of Islam", but here he only says "…when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated…"  Not Christ himself.

So what he said was you can't slander the prophet, and you should condemn the hate when somebody desecrates the image of Jesus…
But wait, doesn't Obama's government fund the National endowment for the Arts, that funded the "Christ in piss" display. 

Wouldn't this be desecration??